I had never seen this sign anywhere except when studying microbiology a couple days ago. I was taking a quiz on the different methods of microorganism sterilization, and came up on this question: ''What is not a benefit of food irradiation?'' The correct answer, in that case, was that it renders the food ''not as nutritious'' as its non-irradiated counterpart.
Interesting. I know that conventional, non-organic dry spices are irradiated. But I had no idea how many more conventionally-grown vegetables and fruits are irradiated in order to be sold in supermarkets. Not only vegetables and fruit, but grains, meat, pork and poultry as well.
Approval | Food | Purpose |
---|---|---|
1963 | Wheat flour | Control of mold |
1964 | White potatoes | Inhibit sprouting |
1986 | Pork | Kill Trichina parasites |
1986 | Fruit and vegetables | Insect control Increase shelf life |
1986 | Herbs and spices | Sterilization |
1990 - FDA 1992 - USDA | Poultry | Bacterial pathogen reduction |
1997 - FDA 1999 - USDA | Meat | Bacterial pathogen reduction |
This site also states that ''Irradiation is a safe and effective technology.'' There is no mention about the loss of nutrients, which I had read about in the microbiology quiz. According to Food and Water Watch, irradiation causes the formation of free radicals, which interact with vitamins to alter and/or degrade their structure. Add to that the longer shelf life that irradiation gives food, plus the fact that produce looses vitamins as it ages... and I come up with basically no vitamins left. Here are a couple examples of vitamins that are affected by irradiation. Thiamine is vitamin B1.
FOOD | LEGAL DOSE OF RADIATION | VITAMINS LOST |
---|---|---|
Mango6 | 1.0 kGy | Vitamin C |
Mandarin orange7 | 1.0 kGy | Vitamin C |
Grapefruit8 | 1.0 kGy | Vitamin C |
Apple9 | 1.0 kGy | Vitamin C |
Potato10 | 1.0 kGy | Vitamin C |
Oats11 | 1.0 kGy | Thiamin |
Wheat flour12 | 1.0 kGy | Thiamin |
Pork13 | 1.0 kGy | Thiamin |
Chicken14 | 3.0 kGy | Thiamin & Vitamin E |
Turkey15 | 3.0 kGy | Thiamin |
Beef16 | 4.5 kGy | Thiamin |
Lamb17 | 4.5 kGy | Thiamin |
I know for a fact that my body is not capable of synthesizing its own vitamins, and that I must obtain them by eating food that contains them in order for my body to function properly. What is the point, then, of eating produce that has no vitamins?
I think back on the Radura sign, and wonder why I have never seen it.
![]() |
Apples and Cobalt 60 |
The FDA, USDA and other government agencies create the regulations that control and manage the food we eat; in this case, the labeling of the food we eat. The FDA also manages to frequently employ former executives of corporations such as Monsanto's Michael Taylor. Conflict?
I have also found conflicting information on the safety of food irradiation. Articles in the NY Times and Grist list pros and cons; the Organic Consumers Association gives me info on free radicals, public health, and a detailed analysis of the FDA's food irradiation brochure.

The USDA also supports the use of GMO's and pesticides. DDT, for example, is a pesticide that was once considered safe, until it was banned in 1972.
Given these facts...
- Irradiated foods are less nutritious
- I do not know for sure that irradiated foods are safe
- There is no way for me to tell which food is irradiated
- The only foods that cannot be irradiated, by law, are organic foods
As for the Radura sign... I finally found it here:
No comments:
Post a Comment